From Forums of the Virgin Mary [translated; note Forum viewpoints are own and may or may not reflect SD’s]:
The story of the progressives and freemasons to get rid of the traditional Mass.
Disturbing news is coming that the progressives, who dominate the Vatican curia, are planning to ban the traditional Latin Mass permanently.
It has not been enough for them to limit it through Traditionis Custodes.
Because young people value it a lot.
And the congregations most attached to tradition are the ones that grow, while the progressive ones decrease.
They fear a restoration of tradition and thereby losing power.
We do not know if they will be able to ban it for a while, because they will hardly be able to make a Mass that was celebrated for 18 centuries disappear.
And it has no other contraindication than to remember the tradition of the Church.
But we want to point out that this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Below is the silent fight of Masonic infiltration attacking everything truly Catholic.
Here we will talk about how Masonic infiltration had a decisive influence on the creation of the novus ordo Mass, the current Mass.
How the hierarchy of the Church was paralyzed at key moments of the advance of the infiltration and allowed its continuity.
And the harshness with which the infiltration acted to fulfill its agenda and expand it.
You will be surprised by these revelations!
On the death of Leo XIII in 1903, the conclave elected Cardinal Mariano Rampolla, but he was vetoed by Francis Joseph I, Emperor of Austria.
Rampolla was a liberal, who was later suspected of having links with the Freemasons.
Then the conclave elected Giuseppe Sarto, Pius X, a conservative, who did a magnificent job fighting the modernists or progressives.
But they did not disappear, but rather blended in until a new opportunity came.
And it came with the Second Vatican Council, where progressive theologians, who had works banned for heresy, became strong.
And from there their growth has been unstoppable until today, when they control the Vatican.
And they do not want to risk going through a restoration of tradition like that of Pius X, that is why they want to definitively liquidate the Traditional Latin Mass.
Those in power now see those who follow tradition as a threat.
Because the real growth that has been happening in the Roman Catholic Church is with the Traditional Latin Mass.
The churches and congregations most attached to tradition are the ones with the greatest growth in the world, while the most progressive are the ones that decrease the most.
The limitation of the Latin Mass promulgated by Traditionis Custodes of 2021 was not enough for progressives, because young people seek a return to tradition.
And then they intend to ban it permanently.
The person behind this project would be Archbishop Vittorio Viola, a Franciscan, Secretary of the Dicastery for Divine Worship.
And Father Charles Murr says he is proud to wear the episcopal ring of the deceptive creator of the Novus Ordo Mass, Archbishop Annibale Bugnini.
Who was Archbishop Annibale Bugnini?
Bugnini had acted under Pius XII with a low profile.
But when John XXIII was elected Pope, he surely knew something about Bugnini, because he expelled him from the Vatican and had him thrown out of the Lateran University.
But when John XXIII died in 1963, Paul VI reinvited Bugnini back to where he was. [scroll for more:]
And it was from there that the chaos began.
And why was Annibale Bugnini misleading?
For two things according to Father Murr.
First for his behavior when he was in charge of the creation of the new Mass.
Bugnini was the intermediary between Paul VI and his committee of 10 experts who worked on liturgical changes, some of them were Protestants.
Which is very strange to say the least.
Bugnini had his own agenda according to Murr.
He lied to each of the parties, to the Pope and to the committee.
When the Pope opposed a change, I told him that the committee of experts wanted it that way.
And when the committee opposed a change he told them that the Pope wanted it that way.
In this way he managed to develop a Mass with his own agenda.
But he fell into disgrace because of information that reached Cardinal Dino Staffa, prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Church.
They presented him with documentation proving that Bugnini was a member of the Masonic Lodge of Italy, the Grand Orient.
Cardinal Staffa contacted Interpol and other investigative bodies in Europe and had him investigated.
And when he was absolutely convinced of the veracity he shared the information with Cardinal Oddi.
With the documentation they went to see Paul VI at the end of 1974.
When he discovered that the person creating the new Mass was a Freemason, it greatly upset the Pope.
And the only way he found to get rid of Bugnini was to promote him to eliminate him, which is the usual way in the Vatican.
He was promoted as Nuncio in Iran, where Catholics are an insignificant portion.
But curiously, the reason why the Mass developed by the freemason Bugnini was continued is not known.
It is worth remembering that in 1972 Paul VI was already coming to the conclusion, for himself, that something was wrong in the Church, when he spoke of the smoke of Satan that had entered through some crack in the Vatican.
Between 1974 and 1975 Paul VI was so distressed and upset by the whole matter, that he asked the Secretary of State, Cardinal Giovanni Benelli, what should be done, because there could be more Freemasons.
According to Father Murr, Benelli was a strong man, while Paul VI was condescending, in the sense that he would give you the benefit of the doubt.
They decided to do an investigation in the curia and for this Benelli suggested Édouard Gagnon, at that time Canadian archbishop of Montreal, in Rome.
Gagnon spent the next three years investigating every person who worked at the Vatican, along with Father Murr, who wrote his experiences in a book.
Murr says that at one point Gagnon began to receive death threats.
His rooms, both at the Canadian College and his office, were raided and ransacked, and his files stolen.
And at the end of the study, when he handed the report over to the Pope, and it was put in a super safe, it was raided and the entire archive was stolen.
Gagnon’s study concluded that it would be good to get rid of Cardinal Sebastiano Baggio, head of the Congregation for Bishops, who for years had appointed all the bishops in the world.
8 But Murr says that when Gagnon handed the study over to Paul VI, he pushed it back to Gagnon and said, I can’t deal with this. Take it to my successor.
The pope was very ill and despondent after the death of his close friend Aldo Moro in an attack, and he died two months later.
In the following conclave Baggio was almost elected Pope, because many bishops he had appointed were already cardinals.
But Benelli pulled a rabbit out of the hat and proposed Cardinal Albino Luciani, who ended up being John Paul I.
He read Gagnon’s report and on the 32nd day of his pontificate he met with Baggio.
They had a very loud argument with Baggio yelling for more than 45 minutes, according to Swiss guards at the door.
Baggio was the last person to see the pope alive , because he died a few hours later of a heart attack.
He was succeeded by John Paul II, who took a couple of years to understand the Vatican, amid numerous trips.
Until he called Gagnon and then decided to dispense with Baggio , who had continued to appoint bishops.
Well, that’s it , we wanted to talk about how Masonic infiltration influenced the development of the current Mass. And how the progressives, who dominate the Vatican curia, do not want to lose that power.
And I would like to ask you if you think that the Vatican Curia is currently heavily infiltrated by Freemasons or not.