From PNW:
With the creators boasting about AI’s vastly superior intelligence, people often unquestioningly trust the answers the programs provide. Ask “Grok” about the origins of life, and you will get an answer detailing the “scientific consensus” involving billions of years of evolution. Neglecting to factor in the bias of those who programmed the technology, the validity of the response is overwhelmingly accepted by users.
+
But what happens when AI is challenged on the facts? Beginning by setting parameters to strip away ideologically driven answers, Smith asked Grok to apply only strict logic, mathematical probability, and observational science in its answers. Spoiler–Grok not only admitted that the theory of evolution is “effectively impossible,” the AI assistant also concluded that intentional creation of life by God is the most probable, adding that those who reject intelligent design are “denying overwhelming evidence.”