![\"May](\"https:\/\/scontent-mia5-1.xx.fbcdn.net\/v\/t39.30808-6\/653703823_1245959994399947_2112990564686426212_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_s640x640_tt6&_nc_cat=101&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=13d280&_nc_ohc=JOvKmibepuIQ7kNvwHPVFEU&_nc_oc=Adqxb99jWgUHYowY0KmxNt_n6OATM0gpnhPRwHHBIUgUpXLsdc9IBZqslzvPoJuFrZRuLPneHxmk3gJftPfLvciX&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-mia5-1.xx&_nc_gid=4LT8MHEjuP-EwyCQJaLtBg&_nc_ss=7a32e&oh=00_AfyvvopRSdl7ANBWl_ISPp-xXCxYk6u_EqCIaS6k3fbMZg&oe=69CB6CF5\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The papacy of <\/span>Pope Leo XIV<\/span> (Robert Francis Prevost) has recently been marked by a resurfaced (or depending on your view, might the word be “contrived”) controversy involving the Andean figure of <\/span>Pachamama<\/span>, drawing immediate and polarized comparisons to the 2019 Pachamama “scandal” under his predecessor, <\/span>Pope Francis<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n While both events involve the same cultural symbol, the context of each\u2014and the Vatican\u2019s response\u2014highlights a shift in how the Church navigates the line between indigenous inculturation and doctrinal purity.<\/p>\n The current controversy surrounding Pope Leo XIV centers on a photograph from <\/span>1995<\/span>, long before his election to the papacy.<\/span> At the time, the future pope was <\/span>Father<\/span>\u00a0Robert Prevost<\/span>, an Augustinian missionary serving in Peru.<\/span> The image, which surfaced in early 2026, depicts him kneeling during an “Eco-theology” colloquium in Brazil.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Those who dismiss the controversies (which have served as blog and YouTube “clickbait”) note that Pope John Paul II, now a saint, was widely criticized for participating in cross-cultural (including Buddhist and Hindu) events in Assisi, Italy, and a voodoo-like ceremony in Africa.<\/p>\n As for Pope Leo XIV, who is far less a lightning rod, critics argue the caption in the original 1996 publication explicitly identifies the event as a “Celebration of the Pachamama Rite.”<\/span> Opponents of the Pope claim that kneeling in such a context constitutes an act of adoration toward a pagan deity.<\/span> Conversely, defenders argue that the gesture was a sign of respect for the “soul of the earth” as a creature of God, rather than a religious act of worship.<\/span> They maintain that for missionaries in the Andes, Pachamama is often viewed as a cultural metaphor for Mother Nature rather than a literal goddess.<\/p>\n The Assisi gathering on October 27, 1986, was intended by John Paul II as a World Day of Prayer for Peace, bringing together Christian leaders and representatives of other religions. The Pope\u2019s defenders stressed that the participants did not merge their religions into one act of worship, but rather came together in a common setting while praying according to their own traditions for peace. Even so, the event became highly controversial because many Catholics felt that the public symbolism created the impression of syncretism. Images from Assisi\u2014especially non-Christian rites taking place in Catholic spaces\u2014convinced critics that the papacy had crossed a line, even if John Paul himself presented the day as a witness to peace, not a denial of Catholic truth.<\/p>\n A related concern arose in France at Taiz\u00e9, the ecumenical Protestant-founded community John Paul II visited on October 5, 1986. To admirers, Taiz\u00e9 represented a sincere search for Christian unity and reconciliation. To critics, however, such appearances encouraged confusion about the differences between Catholicism and Protestantism, especially in an era when many already believed doctrine was being softened in favor of goodwill and symbolism. John Paul praised Taiz\u00e9 warmly, which delighted ecumenists but alarmed those who feared that visible fraternity was being emphasized more than the hard work of doctrinal clarity.<\/p>\n The Africa controversy is often described even more dramatically than the facts support. During his February 4, 1993, trip to Benin, John Paul II met with representatives of Vodun, often called voodoo in English. That meeting was real, and it did provoke criticism. But the strongest claims\u2014that the Pope personally took part in a voodoo rite as an act of worship\u2014go beyond what the main contemporary reporting and Vatican records establish. The controversy instead centered on his willingness to meet Vodun representatives respectfully and to speak about elements in traditional religion that could be points of contact for evangelization. For some Catholics, that approach looked like diplomacy and missionary openness; for others, it looked like dangerous accommodation with a religion associated in the popular imagination with occultism and spirit practices.<\/p>\n In the end, the disputes over Assisi, Taiz\u00e9, the Vatican Garden, and Benin were really disputes over the post-Vatican II direction of the Church. John Paul II believed the Church could enter dialogue without surrendering her identity. His critics worried that public gestures can teach as powerfully as formal doctrine, and that even well-meant encounters may scandalize the faithful when they appear to place Christianity on the same level as other religions. That is why these episodes remain flashpoints to this day: they touch the deepest Catholic questions about truth, mission, and how far a Pope should go in trying to build bridges with the religious world.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The papacy of Pope Leo XIV (Robert Francis Prevost) has recently been marked by a resurfaced (or depending on your.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-81759","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-news","7":"entry"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spiritdaily.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81759","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spiritdaily.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spiritdaily.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spiritdaily.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spiritdaily.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81759"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spiritdaily.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81759\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spiritdaily.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81759"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spiritdaily.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81759"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spiritdaily.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81759"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Like his successors, John Paul II, it can be argued, was simply trying to respect other cultures and religions and building bridges in the hope of future conversion.<\/div>\n<\/div>\nWhen Pope Francis noticed that the Pachamama idol was being brought into the Vatican Gardens by indigenous visitors from the Amazon, he dropped a prepared ecumenical prayer and instead prayed the Our Father<\/em> (which ends with “deliver us from evil”). Few in the blogosphere and media reported that aspect.<\/div>\n<\/div>\nDuring that ceremony, indigenous participants undeniably prostrated before carved wooden statues of a pregnant woman, which were later identified by the media and eventually by Pope Francis himself as “Pachamama.”<\/div>\nBest advice to all Popes: cautious with such symbols. Spirits can rub off, not to mention fuel partisans. As for the first Pachamama controversy, an Austrian activist eventually stole the statues from the Church of Santa Maria in Traspontina and threw them into the Tiber River. Pope Francis apologized for the theft but clarified that the statues were used “without idolatrous intentions,” viewing them as symbols of life and fertility.<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"